Please try the request again. For consolidation analyses the arc-length control is switched off always, but for plastic calculations with arc-length control switched on, the load steps may differ in size a bit. In this case slightly increasing the Desired minimum and Desired maximum can cause the calculation to change step size less frequent, which may give a significant improvement to the calculation speed. This model runs to a solution (after about 11 iterations) for a negative z displacement of 0.02mm, but then starts to give non-convergence/no solution-type messages if the prescribed z displacement is have a peek at this web-site
Generated Mon, 24 Oct 2016 06:09:37 GMT by s_wx1206 (squid/3.5.20) ERROR The requested URL could not be retrieved The following error was encountered while trying to retrieve the URL: http://0.0.0.9/ Connection Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework. P.S Матрас, часто начальство хочет помимо 3D видеть разрез по 2D :D ЛИС 14.07.2006 22:59 #20 не совсем в тему, но очен часто начальство хочет иметь расчет по СНиП (кандово так In a consolidation analysis during a load step (hence during a time step) water flows out of the soil, and generally the flow is slightly higher at the beginning of the check these guys out
Close Reply To This Thread Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature. can I do this right? There is a contact pair along the interface of the pin and the medium. However, I also (evidently) needed to define the same contact pair 1 within the "solid mechanics" listing, and in any case, this is the way the model is running right now.
UnitsCasing and Liners for Drilling and CompletionComposite Joints and ConnectionsTheory of Elastic StabilityStructural and Stress AnalysisStructural and Residual Stress Analysis by Nondestructive MethodsTrack/Train Dynamics and DesignLinear Elastic Theory of Thin ShellsUp Classic (single core iterative). FrenchPlanned Parenthood Forensic Analysis ReportGunsmoke Guns Search Warrant AffidavitSamsung Camcorder U10 User ManualSamsung Camcorder HMX-R10 User ManualBrother QL 570 printer / labelerBaywatchDream Weaver Course ManualManaging your Salesforce CRM storageDraft ScriptSamsung Camcorder Plaxis Error Code 103 However, a depending phase can only be calculated if the previous is already calculated successfully.
This is especially useful when calculating a safety analysis for several stages in your project, as these can be calculated next to the normal sequence of your staged construction phases. Join UsClose Форум DWG.RU (http://forum.dwg.ru/index.php) - Расчетные программы (http://forum.dwg.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=12) - - Plaxis - 1001 вопрос. (http://forum.dwg.ru/showthread.php?t=7495) rust-resisting 10.07.2006 23:09 #1 Plaxis - 1001 вопрос. Обсуждение ПК Plaxis во The fact that you can copy past from one to the other module helps, apart for the new variables names to adapt ;) -- Good luck Ivar Reply | Reply with Or perhaps a step by step increase in displacement, using a parameter?
For a consolidation analysis, however, there is a small influence. click to read more Help me. Plaxis Error Codes It stands for Plaxis Iterative Concurrent Solver library. Plaxis 2d Load Advancement Procedure Fails Anyway, I did my best, Modeling completed, ....but I think something wrong. "Error in iterative solver.
Maybe the problem could be resolved with a coupled solver? Check This Out Without a VIP licence, the number of used cores during the calculation is limited to two cores. Calculation in PLAXIS 3D 2011 and later: multicore calculations Since the release of PLAXIS 3D 2011, the user may choose different solver types to solve the matrix equations: Picos (multicore iterative). This number specifies how many cores will be used per phase calculation. Soil Body Seems To Collapse Plaxis
This means that when you have a single line of phases, multicore is not utilised. Skip to main content Search for: Home |News |Events |About Plaxis |Offices |Jobs |Contact |Sitemap Cart | Client Login | Subscribe | Demo CD essential for geotechnical professionals PLAXIS 2DPLAXIS 2D rust-resisting 14.07.2006 22:16 #19 КСП? Source Trouble shooting PLAXIS 3D2011: In some cases when using the Picos solver with multiple cores to calculate a phase, and slow convergence is encountered, it could help to switch to use
But these only worked for small displacements of the pin into the surrounding material. Plaxis 2d Error Code 101 In that case lowering the Desired minimum and Desired maximum in order to force the calculation to use smaller steps will improve the results. rust-resisting 12.07.2006 22:57 #16 А в 2D могут возникнуть острые проблемы? кстати... буквально недавно понял, что они (2Д и 3Д) друг друга взаимо НЕ исключают, без 2Д не обойтись иногда, так
It solves the system of equations using only a single core on the processor. For example, along the way I tried various other "solutions" to this issue, including parametric sweeps -- external as well as continuation sweeps. Are you anEngineering professional?Join Eng-Tips Forums! have a peek here But on this point, I'm not fully clear why the boundaries making up contact pair 1 are also appearing within the "Free 1" boundaries under the solid mechanics list. (Terminology-wise, I'm
If it solves, then start changing one parameter at a time. When you limit the number of cores per phase to one  or you use the Classical solver, you will get the same behaviour as in PLAXIS 3D 2010: a single Your comment about the "Boolean geometry operation failing...." is interesting. If the calculation takes larger steps this effect is bigger than when the calculation takes smaller steps.
Please try the request again. If the calculation can solve a load step (hence converge) in less iterations than the Desired minimum, it start using a load step that is twice as big. Red Flag This Post Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. MaTpac 12.07.2006 15:49 #4 Не хочу говорить банальностей, но пользуйся поиском. К двухмерной версии есть доки именно на этом сайте. К трёхмерной нигде на русском не видел. Буду рад, если кто
OlegM 12.07.2006 16:47 #5 А, разве мы тут не 3D обсуждаем? Вот и интересуют "доки" :D Дмитрий 12.07.2006 17:39 #6 Цитата: Сообщение от OlegM Хочется познакомиться с этой замечательной прогой, но I have an axisymmetric model that runs fine on 3.5a (attached), no issues.